My topic has not evolved
much since I first started this project. Looking at how effective certain social
media platforms are for archives trying to reach people otherwise unaware of
their existence remains the focus. Platforms which allow users to go and look
at content based on interest, geographic region, or even possibly some other
specific category that might be related to a particular collection within the
archives are still the basis of the research. Any platform that allows users to
go on and see something based on any of those criteria without having to log in
or make any particular effort searching for content may be worth looking at.
Much of the issues surrounding my topic were clear
from the beginning for me as well, with stakeholders, context, and even sub-questions
largely understood by the time I had finished the preliminary research. The way
I was phrasing the question changed and became clearer, but the underlying
question did not. What I had not done in the past was actually look closely at
the different methods for doing academic research. In the end I found interviews would be the method that will work best for the majority of the questions surrounding my
topic, particularly as qualitative information will allow for certain answers
that otherwise could not be found. At the same time, some of the more
quantitative methods actually turned out to be a bit more interesting to me, even if
they were not suitable for the particular question I was asking.
Where I learned the most
throughout this process was in looking at the different research methods in
terms of their strengths and weaknesses. Even more specifically, looking at the
different methods through the need to answer a particular research question
allowed for a much greater understanding of the different research methods,
even if the research question itself remained relatively unchanged throughout the
process.
No comments:
Post a Comment