One artifact I would genuinely love to see examined more
closely would be the old blackberrys and modern cell phones of active
politicians and high ranking bureaucrats. In particular, a report by the
information commissioner from 2013 indicated that instant messaging had become
a serious problem for access to information requests. Texts messages coming
through these devices were and are being used in ways that contributed
meaningfully to the creation of government policy, but there was no method to
keep track of these messages, much less creating records. At present, there
appears to be plans to address this issue, but no complete solutions at this
time.
Although it was unclear if this means of communication was
being used primarily to hide information, or for completely innocent reasons,
the problem remains serious in either case. With full access to these artifacts
over a long enough period of time, so as to actually see the communications
being shared, some particularly pressing questions might be able to be better
answered:
-Exactly what information is being passed through these
devices, and to what extent does it actually contribute to the formation of policy?
-How do those employees who wish to hide their
communications shift more of their work towards this type of device?
-What about this particular method of communication, on a
purely technical level, makes it so difficult to force copies to be sent
concurrently to a government repository, and what privacy concerns would have
to be addressed?
-What makes text messaging specifically so useful that email
on a smart phone can't sufficiently replace it?
This particular problem is one that may only become more
problematic as time goes on, but as phones become more and more like computers,
it might actually sort itself out in relatively short order, at least with the
exception of those using it to actively hide records. Email is no more
difficult to use than instant messaging, with a modern smart phone. In any
case, learning how bureaucrats share and use information through these devices,
particularly as that relates to ATIP legislation, would be worth the effort.
Sources:
Special report: Instant messaging putting access to information at risk. (n.d.). Retrieved March 17, 2016, from http://www.oic-ci.gc.ca/eng/pin-to-pin-nip-a-nip.aspx
No comments:
Post a Comment