Parts of this week's question actually already occurred to
me, about documenting what I'm studying when we were talking about fieldwork in week 5.
To document archives' use of certain types of social media, web archiving is
the only real answer, and I already covered many of the problems with that in week 5.
In looking to preserve digital content into the future, there
are still a few other concerns which I did not talk about all that much in that earlier post. File format
plays a big part in preserving digital content, and concerns like disclosure,
or how much documentation is available for that format, as well as how widely
it has been adopted and whether there are any other dependencies, like
requiring proprietary software, all play roles in determining a format's
longevity. This is not an exhaustive list. Making sure that the information a
researcher wishes to preserve is in a format which will still be accessible
years into the future is an extraordinarily important concern. No format is
completely free from the risk of obsolescence, but pdf, as an example, does not
appear to be hard to get access to in the future (Pearson and Webb, 2008). Planning
for migration or emulation in the future for all content which a researcher
wishes to keep available will be absolutely vital to properly preserving it, as
will routinely looking at the environment for files of that type, and looking
into migration options. Like all preservation, proper risk assessments will
help make sure that there is nothing being forgotten, at least as much as this is
actually possible.
To actually answer how I personally would keep track of the
materials which I am talking about, I would look at current developments in web
archiving and do everything else I practically could to save the content.
Mostly, this would be keeping multiple backup copies of everything I produce,
and ideally checking them regularly for bitloss or other forms of corruption.
I'd do everything I could to use web archiving software to gather as many of
the postings related to the topic as possible, store the resulting records as
safely as I could in as open and widely adopted a format as I can find, and
plan to migrate it to another format before the one I started becomes obsolete.
I do hope that the technology involved improves in the future and solves these
problems for me, but ultimately I would have to accept that, as I talked about
in week 5, there really only is so much that can be done to properly preserve
online content at this time. No matter how much effort I devote to this during
my research, a great deal of what I am researching will one day simply
disappear without any real trace.
Sources:
Brown, A.
(2013). Practical Digital Preservation: a how-to guide for organizations of
any size. London: Facet Publishing.
Giaretta,
D. (2011). Advanced digital preservation. New York: Springer.
Kasioumis,
N., Banos, V., & Kalb, H. (2013). Towards building a blog preservation
platform. World Wide Web, 17(4), 799–825.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-013-0234-4
Pearson,
D., & Webb, C. (2008). Defining File Format Obsolescence: A Risky Journey. International
Journal of Digital Curation, 3(1), 89–106.
http://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.44
Webber,
J. (n.d.). What is still on the web after 10 years of archiving? - UK Web
Archive blog. Retrieved March 3, 2016, from
http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/webarchive/2014/10/what-is-still-on-the-web-after-10-years-of-archiving-.html
I also came to this realization James. My focus is preserving (digital) oral history records, but there is only so much that can be done. We can follow all of the existing "Best Practices" out there, but, just like print, some things will inevitably be lost in time. Again, like you, I also looked into file formats and the concern of obsolescence. This largely depends on what is popular at the time, which could also easily change. It almost seems like a win-lose situation.
ReplyDeleteMigration or emulation may provide answers for some of this, but there are many problems with these methods. I'm actually far more hopeful about the types of audio files you're likely talking about than I am some others, simply because so long as at least a somewhat modern computer can play it, that computer can be made to "record" what it is playing, allowing at least some form of migration of the file type.
ReplyDelete