Wednesday, 3 February 2016

Week 3 “Results: You are Patricia Collins!”

From https://www.boombox.com/c/quiz/49304/17d1b70c-c863-4d2c-a5ed-4968c92773cf  :


" Results: You are Patricia Collins! 

Author of Black Feminist Thought and one of the most influential voices in contemporary standpoint Theory, it’s not enough for you to question how social systems work, but you want to expose how these systems privilege and oppress various groups. You advocate for the reclaiming of lost voices in knowledge narratives. You not only reject the idea of objective Truth, but you believe that validating subjectivity is essential in the quest for truer knowledge. You believe listening to and validating the experiences of the oppressed leads to a more complete understanding of the world. Power to the people you critical theorist! "



The result of the test, my first take, details that I am Patricia Collins. True, we share similarities, we are both women of colour. I agree that I am a critical theorist, for the most part in consideration to all of the conflict theory and inequality that I have written on/inclinations of reading (an example, see my previous blog post, the second bullet/research question http://methodologicalagnostics.blogspot.ca/2016/01/week-2-potential-research-questions.html ). 

But like most quizzes, the results are quite general and seem like they can apply to anyone, much like the daily horoscopes posting in your local newspaper. Like the daily horoscope, even if it's wrong, readers (like me) hope to aspire to some of the complimenting attributes written in the short text. For example, I do hope that I “reject the idea of the objective Truth [and…] believe in validating subjectivity [which] is essential in the quest of truer knowledge". Most of all the last bit on subjectivity, I think would very likely be the source of my research inclinations, as well as anyone else's (or at least I think so--see what I did there? :P).

Lilian Le-Dang

No comments:

Post a Comment