Completing this
week’s exercise was a bit of a challenge for me as seen from the big and
weirdly shaped flower to the left (the one that looks like a sunflower/daisy
hybrid). Its petals, as I have attempted, contain specific search terms or
categories that I could delve further into.
The second
smaller flower contains petals with much more general headings, but as a
clarification note (I forgot to add, before uploading the image) is that copyright
would be the word accompanying the terms (e.g. copyright laws, copyright
freedom etc.). I know this picture seems quite unorthodox, compared to my
colleagues’ and of course far from looking like the exemplar figure in Luker (2010, p.83). However, this exercise was quite
effective at helping me illustrate my messy thoughts. To give a little bit more
contextual information, the bigger daisy to the left was drawn first and the
smaller one to the right was last.
What this exercise has made me realize is
that if I were to use these headings (the terms in the individual petals) as a guide for search terms, it will
generate too many and/or not specific to my expected/initial
inquiry. I could look at the headings paired with each other (e.g. search
copyright laws and fair use in one go) and find something useful to my research.
I might also to refer to ‘sister/brother’ terms at times to look up more
research (at which point would lead me to my reference librarian/personal
librarian who could better direct my search). While this sounds tedious, I am relatively
optimistic since it can be very useful to browse though academic journals (among
other resources) that deal with the same overarching topics and still manage to
stumble upon a valuable resource. Much like the “Zen paradox: you can never
know what you’re looking for unless you know what it was you were looking for
in the first place” (Luker, 2010, p. 60).
Lilian Le-Dang
References
Luker, K. (2010). Salsa dancing into
the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

No comments:
Post a Comment