Friday, 12 February 2016

Week 4: Catherine's bedraggled daisy 1.0

Hello everyone!

Before I start, and before you take a look at my daisy and think that I have really overthought the exercise and ended up with concepts and ideas that are not related to the research I talked to you about in my previous posts (!!!), I just want to say that I have decided to change my research topic. I have been missing anthropology ever since I graduate from my bachelor’s degree and I am trying to incorporate more of that background of mine in my current studies.

That being said, I started the bedraggled daisy with an open mind, after reading your posts and not being sure how useful it would be. Well… how difficult can it be to draw a daisy? I think that was the hardest part for me! Even if my change of heart regarding my research topic has been recent, I already had a very good idea of where I was going before doing the exercise, which I think is one of the reasons why I was not as good as an exercise as others from Luker’s book. Luker’s book has been surprisingly helpful for me, even more so in the past few days when I decided to explore a different topic and had to start my research from scratch. Before I started reading the book, I thought to myself, well, I have read other research methods books and I never felt that it really helped with research, except for giving me a good knowledge of research concepts, so why would this one be different? I am still not sure how, but it is different, since I have been able to come up with a new, yet strong research topic more quickly than I ever did in the past for any research project.


Back to the bedraggled daisy exercise, even if I think that it was not blown away by its helpfulness at first, I think it is a great way to summarize your research’s “big ideas” and thus explaining it to others. And I think that is where I can find the usefulness of the exercise for me: ever since I have been “doing research”, I have always used sounding boards to help me improve my research projects. I talk about my research to people who know the field, but also to people who are completely foreign to it, and I am always amazed at the ideas that come out of these discussions. For me, the bedraggled daisy and the connections I see between the petals are obvious, but I am curious to see if shown to someone else, new and/or better connections may come up. Actually, I might try that, and I will let you know about it!

1 comment:

  1. I hadn't thought of the daisy as a summary! That's a good way of conceptualising it. I didn't find it useful in the way that Luker intended, but it definitely forced me to flush out my topic.

    ReplyDelete